Tuesday, July 14, 2009

Tomorrow - interesting reading




My Favorite Links:


 (office of civil rights - Education)





Sunday, July 12, 2009

Bad News Even the Center Cannot Hold

Mike Antonucci

www.eiaonline.com/intercepts/


Mickey Kaus points us to the latest report from the Citizens’ Commission on Civil Rights, titled “National Teachers’ Unions and the Struggle Over School Reform.”

I thought about excerpting the stinging barbs from CCCR’s absolute flaying of NEA and AFT, but it’s really worth your time to read the entire 36-page report, then head over to this page for a list of the organization’s commissioners. Not a conservative right-wing bastard in the bunch.

The public perception battle is over, and the teachers’ unions have lost. But will it have any effect on Congress and state legislatures? The NRA, tobacco companies, PETA, the ACLU and Big Oil all have negative public images they can’t shed, yet they are still effective in getting their way. What if NEA and AFT stop caring what other people think?

Moreno Valley teachers laid off, then rehired, in danger of losing jobs again

10:00 PM PDT on Friday, July 10, 2009
By MELISSA EISELEIN
The Press-Enterprise

Some Moreno Valley Unified School District teachers and counselors will have to wait until Monday to learn if their new contract for the 2009-10 school year will continue to be in effect. Their jobs were cut by the district at the end of the 2008-09 school year. On June 25, they received a call asking them to come back and sign a new contract for the 2009-10 school year. Then, on July 2, they got another call saying the district may renege on the agreement.

"It's been a roller coaster," said Janet MacMillan, president of the Moreno Valley Educators Association.

Trustees were scheduled to vote on cuts affecting the equivalent of 97.5 full-time positions Friday during a special board meeting. After a long closed-session meeting, the vote was postponed until Monday."We're still trying to work out some alternative options," Superintendent Rowena Lagrosa said.

About 150 teachers, counselors, friends and family members held a protest against the cuts Friday. Lizeth Piskulich, a third-grade teacher at Towngate Elementary School, turned down an offer at a Temecula charter school when she learned the Moreno Valley district was hiring her back. Now, that Temecula position is no longer open and she may lose her Moreno Valley job.Piskulich signed a contract and is legally bound to start work Aug. 10, even though the district could let her go effective Aug. 14, she said."I don't know how they can get away with this," Piskulich said.

California Teachers Association President David Sanchez was at Friday's meeting. He urged trustees to use one-time federal stimulus money to save jobs. Sanchez said districts throughout the state are making midsummer cuts, he said. But this is the first time in his 15 years with the teachers union that he's seen districts take advantage of an education code that allows them to do it, he said.

Reach Melissa Eiselein at 951-763-3462 or meiselein@PE.com

Saturday, July 11, 2009

AFT Stages Coup (or Counter-Coup?) in Oregon

AFT Stages Coup in Oregon
(What most Unions Are but ARE NOT SUPPOSED to be. This is a perfect example or what the MVEA - per instruction of the mostly useless CTA, did to us in the last negotiations. Remember CTA president said during the bloody pink campaign a few months back? "A
union is not a democracy." Our own president, when cornered on the issue said, "it is past practice." referring the key premise of negotiations, 300 plus lost jobs, was never even presented to the members for consideration. No information, no guidance just past practice.)

Today’s lesson comes courtesy of Bernadette Marso, president of the Leominster Education Association in Massachusetts. Her members just voted down, by a 305-47 margin, a five-year, $856,000 grant from the Advanced Placement Training and Award Program. The program, among other things, pays teachers of Advanced Placement courses bonus money “if they successfully recruit more students to take AP courses and if the students perform well on the end-of-the-year AP exam.”

Some district officials and parents complained about the union decision because the bonuses were just one part of the program, which includes professional development and a subsidy to offset the AP exam fee for the students. But the union stood firmly opposed.

“We understand that some people will not understand the vote, but we confronted this from a union perspective,” Marso said. “We have a fair and equitable contract with the district, and to have a third party come in and start paying certain teachers more money than other hard-working teachers goes against what a union is all about.

Tuesday, July 7, 2009

Sacramento City Teachers Association President Shares CTA'S Concerns with Assembly Member

"Sweet Creeping Jesus Batman.That Assemblyman looks like he's never heard CTA's half-assed rhetoric before!"


Sacramento City Teachers Association (CTA) President Linda Tuttle shares with Assembly Member Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) information about how proposed cuts will devastate public schools in his district. (My god! Who would have guessed a politician would respond like this? )The Assembly Member denounced the cuts as terrible and pledged his continuing support for public education.
Sacramento City Teachers Association (CTA) President Linda Tuttle shares with Assembly Member Tom Ammiano (D-San Francisco) information about how proposed cuts will devastate public schools in his district. (My god! Who would have guessed a politician would respond like this? )The Assembly Member denounced the cuts as terrible and pledged his continuing support for public education.

The visit to the Capitol on June 18 by SCTA Pres. Tuttle to lawmakers’ offices was (the bigger) part of ongoing efforts by CTA and its Education Coalition partners (Larry, Curly and Moe) to persuade legislators to reject Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger’s proposed education slashes.

The legislative budget adjustment package proposed by a joint house conference committee and endorsed by Senate President Pro Tempore Darrell Steinberg (D-Sacramento) and Assembly Speaker Karen Bass (D-Los Angeles) rejects $700 million of the governor’s education cuts and ensures schools some $9.3 billion in paybacks to Proposition 98 in coming years. The legislative adjustment package would also suspend the requirement that students pass the California High School Exit Examination in order to graduate. Assembly Speaker Bass told reporters at a Wednesday news conference that it is unconscionable to demand that students meet that requirement without the funding necessary to help schools prepare them for the test.

Monday, July 6, 2009

This many members and the best we can get from the CTA is a "spend and wait." attitude for the 2nd year in a row!

340,000 dues paying members (305,000) since last years one time bailout. And the best CTA seems willing to offer is to 'DONATE $$$ THEN WAIT AND SEE WHAT HAPPENS' Everone, lie FACE DOWN,put your hand behind your head... Meanwhile, the popular press has joined the right wing whackos in perpetuating lies and misconceptions about taxes, over-paid union workers, the bullying tactics and their unfair power. These people and the "thirty second attack ad voters" are disemboweling California public schools? THE nea AND cta have destroyed their reputations long ago. They are only this year realizing that they have to be a Union not a professional association. The weren't effective as an association anyway. The CTA has no clue or refuses to use action, organize for the use of said action, or how to get into the communities to win parent community support. WE HAVE TO ACT NOW!! LOUD AND WITH FORCE!! For example: WE NEED INFORMATIONAL PICKETS EVERY DAY during the first week of August. How about the 45 minutes before the contract start of the first two or three days of school!! We should already be walking and papering the respective boundaries of our district. Sick out if that's ALL the law allows for but IF WE'RE A UNION THEN WE BETTER ACT LIKE ONE! The operant term is "ACT" In similar financial times, under the AFL-CIO, we had to strike every three years when our contract came up. We didn't loose an employee and we increased our position in regards to the contract each time. But it wasn't easy and it wasn't done by simply complaining.

I've been in three strike actions in my years and not a single one was pleasant but one week of screaming substitute baby sitters in the most kids will be going ape, maybe hurting themselves (heaven forbid) a perpetuating free for all and parents will eat this Governor alive - Like a cheap horror film.

WE have the stick prepare to use it. PREPARE TO STRIKE! Even though the CTA is over two years late in admitting what we all saw coming, THE OPERANT TERM is "prepare" now! (OOPS, Screwed again! Our local has allowed a no strike/ no lockout clause into our washed down version of a mutually agreeable contract. Our board can now pick us part at their leisure.) NO Mr. Sanchez, you can't raise our dues. UPDATE: YES THEY DID RAISE OUR DUES! In a site rep. only secret ballot.You've squandered $$$ enough to fund the budget of many school districts entirely. IT'S YOUR FAULT WE HAVE NO STRIKE AND DEFENSE FUND. The board members must have been laughing it's collective ass off. 'They really bought it... LOL'


Exactly One year later... But it doesn't matter for us. They thought they were positioning themselves for better vantage gaining a lasting camaraderie. What they got was the view from under our board's dysfunctional "Jack Boot."
CTA is the state's largest representative of education employees, serving more than 340,000 employees of California’s schools, colleges and universities. It supposedly exists to protect and advance the professional and economic interests of its members. CTA should work tirelessly for better working conditions, higher salaries, improved health benefits, progressive personnel policies and an affordable and dignified retirement. Instead we have the labor equivalent to the W Bush administration. It's leader an unqualified, morally challenged. A do nothing who in Bush's case bankrupted three corporations and then an entire country. The Saudi family had to bail bush out on the third endeavor. Is that what the new secret dues increase of approximately $20 per head is supposed to do for Sanchez. I personally can't wait for the AFT to start raiding California (like they did in one district in Oregon)- Mo Val first.

We have two more title waves to deal with so we demand better from OUR leaders. Privatization of education is almost on us and complete computerization is not far behind. (SEE WWW.CALVIA.COM)

Saturday, July 4, 2009

Moreno Valley schools budget approved; services to take 'some hits'

10:00 PM PDT on Thursday, July 2, 2009
By DAN LEE
The Press-Enterprise


"Sorry Moms, Dads, Families, Kid's - but It's Going to Get Worse!" Much Worse Than This.

Moreno Valley children will have fewer teachers, larger classes, less supervision for suspended (Read: ALL) students and fewer sports teams when they return to school this fall. The Moreno Valley Board of Education this week approved a $284 million budget for the 2009-10 school year, closing a $23 million gap between projected revenue and spending. "There's definitely going to be some hits," board President Tracey Vackar said by phone. The district issued layoff notices to 254 teachers (and counselors) in May and eliminated nearly 30 administrative or supportive positions; increased elementary classes sizes; reduced bus driver hours and school maintenance services; and delayed buying new textbooks to help close the shortfall. Does any one else read the missing text? Bob Krank is giving away the question. Most importantly will we pit careers against salary schedule? (see my answers at tbe end of this peace.)

Parents and students will have to get used to slower ( Read: almost no ) services, because the district has fewer employees, Vackar said.
In addition, the board reduced the amount of money budgeted for student activities and athletics, eliminating freshman sports teams. "The good news is that a lot of freshman kids will be eligible to compete with the junior varsity," Vackar said. The board did decide to keep three school resource officers at middle schools, because members felt that health and safety are priorities, she said. But district officials know that they will likely have to trim another $20 million because of state funding cuts that are expected because of California's budget crisis. The district could use federal stimulus funds to help close that additional shortfall, but those monies are only available once and are usually not used for recurring expenses. The board does not want to use all of the stimulus money at once, Vackar said. "You would pass off your problem for another year," she said.

Instead, the district will use some of that money and make up the rest of the expected shortfall with further cuts, Assistant Superintendent Bob Crank said. Those cuts could include increased class sizes, furloughs or pay cuts, he said by phone. Further layoffs are a possibility, Superintendent Rowena Lagrosa said. Eighty-four percent of the district's budget pays for personnel, she said. "You can't help but touch upon personnel," Lagrosa said by phone. Some of the cuts might come during the middle of the fall semester or be implemented for the spring semester, Vackar said. The district may be (read: will barely be) able to afford to provide only a core curriculum, she said. After the district addresses this (years) $20 million shortfall, it will have cut (over) $62 million... since January 2008 because of reduced state funding, the recession and declining enrollment. Extracurricular programs like those aimed at helping students prepare and apply for college may face cuts, Vackar said. "It makes me sick," she said. "Those to me aren't fluff programs. Those are programs that help kids become successful."

Now for my answer. Let me quote the prophetic Pro Football Coach and philosopher Bear Bryant: "SEEMS LIKE DEJA VUE ALL OVER AGAIN."

Friday, July 3, 2009

Al Frankin WINS!

Tuesday afternoon, after a grueling recount process, former Sen. Norm Coleman finally conceded defeat and congratulated Al Franken on his Senate victory in Minnesota. Franken is a longtime union member and supporter of workers' rights. Sen. Franken is expected to take a seat on the powerful Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, where he will play a key role in health care reform.

Sunday, June 28, 2009

Please don't look at the difference ... Please!

I can't believe the difference between the approaches and preparation of the CTA; yep ours-the biggest single state union, and the smaller but action minded community oriented state teachers union the the CFT. Just look at the difference in content and involvement on their web site as compared with the New Yorker... oops, Bookmark and Share I mean the CTA's web site. Go ahead I dare you. I bet you still sit on your ass and tell yourself ' it won't reach me I've made it through tough times for schools before.' Let someone else worry about it. Early this year when I told anyone who would listen that this was coming. One teacher told me that's too bad but, " someones going to pay me for all my years of experience and education." So far, 254 educators have with their jobs, homes, and hope. A lot more will before May. It's always someone elses problem. Thanks for the much needed reinforcing of the ranks of the lowest common denominator. Will you ever get up off all fours? Oh by the way, the aforementioned teacher took an early retirement when he found out what was coming - for him next year. And the union's lack luster efforts were explained away by our locals president as "past practice."

Thursday, June 25, 2009

1 in 3 teens are abused in their relationships

Court to rule on student loan debts

Posted By Lyle Denniston On June 15, 2009 @ 10:07 am In Orders and Opinions |

The Supreme Court, agreeing on Monday to hear four new cases, said it would decide whether an individual who owes on a student loan may wipe out the debt — at least partly — in a bankruptcy without showing that the debt posed an “undue hardship.” The case is United Student Aid Fund v. Espinosa (08-1134).

The Court also said it would spell out the rights of service station operators to sue to challenge the loss, or non-renewal, of their franchises from oil companies. The Court consolidated for review the cases of Mac’s Shell v. Shell Oil (08-240) and Shell Oil v. Mac’s Shell (08-372).

In a third case, the Court will consider putting constitutional limits on states’ authority to restore storm-eroded beaches along the ocean or lakeshores, when such action modifies private property boundary lines. (Stop the Beach Renourishment v. Florida (08-1151).

The fourth new case brought back to the Court an issue it had agreed to decide, but did not resolve, six years ago: when two companies agree to send their disputes to arbitration, may a court order that process to go forward as a class action, if the contract says nothing on that issue. The issue arises anew in Stolt-Nielsen S.A., et al., v. Animalfeeds International Corp. (08-1198).

In two rulings on the merits, the Court struck down, by a 7-2 vote, a tax imposed by the city of Valdez, Alaska, on cargo ships that used its port (Polar Tankers v. Valdez, 08-310), and it issued a unanimous ruling clarifying the findings that an immigration judge must make in order for a conviction of a crime to be used as the basis for deportation (Nijhawan v. Holder, 08-495).

The Court, moving toward a summer recess starting late this month, has 14 decisions to go. It announced Monday that it would sit again on Thursday, and more decisions are expected then.

The Court, in another of Monday’s orders, invited the U.S. Solicitor General to offer the federal government’s views on an issue under the bankruptcy law’s Chapter 13 — what is the formula bankruptcy courts are to use in deciding how much a Chapter 13 debtor has available to pay creditors who hold no security, when a repayment plan is being fashioned. There is no deadline for the S.G.’s response. The case is Hamilton, Trustee, v. Lanning (08-998).

Among the cases the Court refused to hear on Monday was a constitutional dispute over the federal government’s powers to set aside federal and state laws that interfere with the building of the long fence on the U.S.-Mexico border, part of an effort to restrict drug traffic and thwart terrorist movements. The Court had turned aside that controversy a year ago (07-1180). This time, the Justices examined the new case at eight separate private meetings, then still came to the conclusion that it would not rule on it. The case is El Paso County, et al., v. Napolitano (08-751). As usual, the Court offered no explanation for denial of review.

In another denial, the Court refused to hear a claim that anti-Castro sentiment was so rampant in the Miami, Fla., area that a group of five Cubans could not get a fair trial there on charges of spying for that government. The case had stirred a strong international reaction. It was Campa, et al., v. U.S. (08-987).

Filings in granted cases and the CVSG case are below the jump.

State getting IOUs ready


Wednesday, June 24, 2009
By JIM MILLER
Sacramento Bureau
Press Enterprise

SACRAMENTO - California Controller John Chiang warned Wednesday that the state would issue IOUs for the first time in 17 years starting next week unless the Legislature starts fixing an estimated $24 billion budget shortfall. Chiang's announcement came as a Democrat-crafted package of budget cuts failed on party-line votes, highlighting the Capitol's gridlock in solving the state's budget mess and avoiding a cash crisis in July.

Lawmakers are scheduled to be back in session this morning to try again. Legislative leaders told lawmakers to be ready for floor sessions throughout the weekend. Yet there were no signs Wednesday that lawmakers are anywhere close to an agreement on fixing the 2009-10 spending plan passed only four months ago. State revenue has nosedived since then and voters rejected several billion dollars in budget solutions. Wednesday's legislation contained about $11 billion in spending cuts. The Legislature's majority Democrats said they would oppose additional reductions to children's health, welfare-to-work, and in-home care programs. "We're the eighth-largest economy in the world. There is no excuse for us not being able to provide for our most vulnerable citizens," said state Sen. Denise Moreno Ducheny, D-San Diego, who represents part of Riverside County.

Republicans countered that the Democratic proposal would still leave the state spending billions more than it takes in. They also opposed higher taxes on oil and tobacco products that are part of a different bill that was not considered Wednesday. "You think we enjoy making cuts? You think we want to see little kids running around without shoes or food or anything like that?" said state Sen. Bob Dutton, R-Rancho Cucamonga. "The problem is that the way we've been going about this the last six or seven years wasn't the right way to do it," said Dutton, the Senate GOP's budget point person. Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger has proposed billions in additional cuts and the elimination of some health and welfare programs. The governor has vowed to veto the Democrat-crafted legislation if it reaches his desk. The governor's office said Wednesday's debate "has cost the state valuable time and pushed us closer to insolvency."

IOU ahead

Wednesday's budget votes were the first since all-night legislative sessions in February yielded $41.7 billion in higher taxes, spending cuts and borrowing as part of a spending plan that was supposed to take the state through June 2010. The state's budget problems won't go away. California's projected tax revenue has fallen by billions. Last month, voters snubbed $6 billion in borrowing and fund shifts assumed in the February deal.

The state now is on pace to run out of money by July 28. Treasurer Bill Lockyer and Chiang -- both Democrats -- and Schwarzenegger have called on lawmakers to fix the budget by the end of June to allow enough time to arrange short-term loans.

Chiang's IOU announcement adds another level of urgency in the standoff. The state has not issued IOUs since 1992. Chiang's office delayed some payments during a cash crunch earlier this year but the problem is much worse now, his office said. "We need to conserve cash in order to make all the payments at the end of July," controller's spokeswoman Hallye Jordan said.

Bond holders, schools, and some other state programs get first dibs on state money. The state cannot issue IOUs to state employees because of a court ruling after the 1992 IOUs. The IOUs would go to companies doing business with the state, local governments, and some other recipients of state money. They later would be repaid in full, plus interest.

Issuing IOUs likely would worsen the state's credit rating. That would make it more expensive, if not impossible, to borrow money next month and thereafter. "If the state starts issuing IOUs, the damage to our credit rating could be substantial and long-term. It could take years to recover," Lockyer spokesman Tom Dresslar said. State Sen. Gloria Negrete McLeod, D-Chino, said Republican lawmakers should support the Democratic plan and avoid the IOUs. If the Republicans don't feel it's enough, well, they don't have a plan," she said. "Somebody said this is like giving a starving man a hamburger and he doesn't want it because it doesn't have fries." I want to solve the problem. I'd stay here 24 hours a day if I have to if we actually solve the problem," (S)he said.

Sunday, June 21, 2009

Riverside County Board of Supervisors, others volunteer for 10 percent pay cuts

:00 PM PDT on Tuesday, June 16, 2009
By JULIA GLICK
The Press-Enterprise

All Riverside County supervisors and several other elected officials have volunteered for 10 percent pay cuts to help save money and to demonstrate solidarity with workers who are being asked to make concessions, it was announced Tuesday.

Supervisors Roy Wilson and Marion Ashley requested and were granted 10 percent pay reductions last week. They encouraged other elected officials to do the same. Supervisor John Tavaglione, who was traveling last week on county business, announced Tuesday he would join them. Supervisors Jeff Stone and Bob Buster followed suit. "We need to set the example for our employees in these very difficult times," Tavaglione said. "I think our board should be unanimous in that regard."

Supervisors will each see a cut of about $14,300 to their annual $143,000 salaries. The cuts would last at least one year and could be renewed based on the county's financial position. County Executive Officer Bill Luna next week plans to propose that managers take similar cuts to their pay and benefits, according to a county news release. Auditor-Controller Robert Byrd, Treasurer-Tax Collector Don Kent and Assessor-County Clerk-Recorder Larry Ward have also requested cuts.

The county is working to close a $130 million revenue shortfall in the fiscal year that begins July 1. It has sought concessions from several employee unions.In April, supervisors authorized Luna to impose cuts and furloughs on managers who are not represented by unions.

The county is running out of time on the budget, Luna said in a written statement. Hopefully, unions will recognize the budget crisis and agree to their share of cuts, he added. The county plans to adopt a budget June 30.

Riverside County Board of Supervisors, others volunteer for 10 percent pay cuts


Friday, June 19, 2009

Retribution - by any means necessary

June 4, Looks like they couldn't get to me legally regarding my published political opinions, except by forcing an attack of dubious reasoning, on the school counseling website I made for my schools parents, kids and the department: www.vhmscounselors.com. This was also built on my own time, on a private server because the DO said we were almost out of space on the school server. The name is even registered to me. You'll see that www.vhmscounselors.com is gone as a favor to my new principal. Even though CWA the department over counseling had requested that each school have their counseling department build it's own web site. Only two Moreno Valley MS's don't have Title One money. Title One schools can and have used this money to hire an out side agency to build and maintain websites for them. Cost only $3000.00 a year. My principal is a nice guy stuck between a rock and a hard place. The powers that be even had him quoting statements from an email or letter from my after hours political blog - you know the one your reading - saying they supposedly came from the counseling web site. They must have known he hadn't taken the time to look it over even though it was still under construction. He admitted he hadn't read the page (or the web site) even though I asked, more out of proof that I could do it than anything. I then asked him if he would go over the site page by page so I could better understand the problem but he declined for another time. I was particularly taken to task regarding my statements regarding the changing voter's attitudes toward public schools and asking parents to please become more informed and more involved.

Oh how could I be so brazen. Further, I had a picture of the "unknown comic" from the eighties on one page. Just for fun, a person with a smiling grocery bag (as in gag) over his or her head. As well as a picture of myself dressed for Halloween as a Roman Senator, you know Rome! Aligned with the sixth grade curriculum. I was told that someone at the DO found it offensive! No names were given, see also "blackey Houston's Moreno valley" and most anything written by 'MVgordie.' This all occurred two days after the hail storm of critical commentary from the readers of the Press Enterprise's timid report on Victoria Baca's arrest. I admitted (in my blog and the P.E. commentaries) to having seen Mrs Baca engaged in some very racist comments of her own. In doing so I probably gave my ID away. I have always made it clear that I am a concerned educator in Moreno Valley. No problems, I too ms. Baca have a right to freedom of speech. Anyway, the principal was told "someone" from the DO would be putting paper (a reprimand) in my file." Further, he asked me to go home and made it clear that I wasn't to return until I had a doctor's written "clean bill of health." I asked what he meant and he just told me the same thing again. " a clean bill of health. I returned to Friday morning with the note. and went about my day. The first day of my vacation. I was left a message from the Principal to call him. I needed to come in and move my stuff from my office so it could be painted. Knowing this was the whim of our guidance clerk and the DO was broke. I sent a letter to the lead custodian and one of the head painters saying that I really didn't want. MY office painted. Never the less The Principal came in and immediately called me. Telling me to come in on the first day of summer break. Lets see what "retribution" is in the works come August.

catdanc's shared items

Thursday, June 18, 2009

Cuts cost L.A. Unified its Teach for America instructors for next year

Teacher cuts in L.A. Unified
Al Seib / Los Angeles Times
Libby Pier, a Teach for America teacher, works with a student Marisa Solano on Thursday. She was one of many in the program in Los Angeles Unified School District to receive a pink slip from the district, which is cutting one-third of its current TFA teachers and is taking no new ones next year.
The district, facing a steep budget shortfall, says it won't be able to afford new teachers from the program, which places college graduates in low-income schools.
By Seema Mehta
June 19, 2009
The financially strapped Los Angeles Unified School District says it cannot afford to hire any new teachers next year from Teach for America, a prestigious program that places high-achieving college graduates in low-income, underperforming schools.

The district has worked with the nonprofit since the early 1990s; more than 600 Teach for America members have taught in L.A. Unified classrooms since 2004. Now, in addition to taking no new teachers from the program next year, the district is considering laying off a third of its current 67 first-year Teach for America members.

"Over the years, Teach for America corps members have made a tremendous impact on the students and schools they serve," said Deborah Ignagni, L.A. Unified's administrator of certificated employment operations. "This impact toward improving student achievement and the social condition of their school communities is immeasurable."

But for now, the district's decision means that in Teach for America's Los Angeles region, which is among the organization's largest nationwide, most members will teach at charter schools, not traditional public schools. Charters are publicly funded schools that operate independently and are free from many state and district regulations.

"So long as we are serving students from low-income settings in public schools, we are agnostic about the governance model of those schools," said Brian Johnson, executive director of the nonprofit's Los Angeles operation. "We want to have a significant presence in traditional public schools. However, if there are no vacancies in traditional LAUSD schools this year, we want to ensure that we are still bringing top talent into classrooms in Los Angeles."

Teach for America is a highly selective program that places recent college graduates in low-income classrooms across the nation.

Some educators are critical of the program, saying its young teachers lack the training of traditional teachers and sometimes use the time to add an altruistic flourish to their resumes before they move on to more lucrative careers.

Supporters point out that teacher turnover in troubled schools is high regardless, and that after Teach for America members finish their two-year commitment, two-thirds continue to work in education. Research also has shown that the Teach for America members are as effective as teachers with conventional credentials.

For the coming school year, the program accepted 4,100 out of 35,000 applicants for placements across the nation. About 140 of these teachers will be based in the Los Angeles area, and more than 100 of them will be placed in charter schools.

The program's 14 placements in the Compton Unified School District for next year appear unchanged for now. But 13 placements in the Pasadena Unified School District are uncertain as the district struggles with state budget cuts, officials said.

"All things told, we have . . . felt very fortunate to have the caliber of teachers we were able to bring on the Muir staff from TFA," said Tim Sippel, assistant principal at Pasadena's John Muir High School, where five were placed this year. "We desperately hope we can retain them in the midst of the budget crisis we are facing as a district."

In Los Angeles, the Teach for America members who recently received pink slips are among some 2,500 employees in the district facing layoffs as the district struggles to find $132 million in additional cuts this school year, and $143 million more for the coming year. Teachers in the program are paid $39,788 annually, the same as other new teachers with alternative certifications. The district also pays the organization a $3,000 training fee for each member it hires.

Libby Pier, 22, an eighth-grade English teacher at Los Angeles Academy Middle School, was angry and hurt when she received her layoff notice in the mail. The Boston native, who graduated from Northwestern University last year, said her year of teaching in South Los Angeles has been rewarding and challenging, and a learning experience.

"I've fallen in love with my school, with my kids, and the idea of being able to help even one student and make a difference in their lives and make them love learning," said Pier, who has interviewed at four inner-city charter schools and may pursue a doctorate in educational psychology if she can't find a classroom position. "I was definitely planning on remaining in teaching. . . . Now, I don't have a job."

seema.mehta@latimes.com



Tuesday, June 16, 2009

What CFT Members Can Do About the State Budget Crisis - Print E-mail

What (We and) CFT Members Can Do About the State Budget Crisis:
(sorry it's hard to find good info let alone tactics from CTA)
Background of the budget gap The news is bad for the state budget...again. In 2008, in response to a projected deficit of 17 billion dollars, the governor and Legislature produced a disastrous state budget. The Republicans abdicated all real world responsibility as legislators, refusing to consider any taxes at all. The Senate and Assembly Democrats, anxious about the suffering of the most vulnerable Californians as the state budget was shut off, caved in to the governor's proposal and the Republicans' obstinance. Only the Assembly Democrats offered, along the way, a reasonable revenue proposal, which included returning income tax rates on the very wealthiest Californians ($300,000 per year income and up) to the rates they paid in the 1990s, which would have raised six billion dollars per year. But this proposal was dropped. The CFT worked with the Education Coalition to raise public awareness of the devastating impact a budget without any new revenues would have on the quality of education in California, but to no
avail this year.

Now the same factors that produced the budget crisis last year are being enormously compounded by the national economic crisis. To his credit, the governor has added the small progressive tax on oil into the mix with his regressive sales tax proposal. But the problem is deeper than just this year. We have a structural gap in the California state budget, varying year by year, but running in the billions of dollars.
Solving the budget gap in California requires a reasonable solution—one that the governor is pointedly ignoring, along with his role in creating the problem. This is a large state, with the largest population in the United States, and an economy that, if it were a country's, would be the sixth largest in the world. The budget problem can't be solved by cuts anymore, because state program reductions of such a magnitude hurt the people most who can least afford them. Indeed, such cuts threaten the future well-being of California.
We need instead to increase state revenues with carefully considered tax increases, especially closing tax loopholes for those who can most afford to pay: the wealthy and large corporations. Taking these actions will allow us to fund the social programs we need.
What created the problem?Mostly undiscussed, but crucial to understanding California's problem, is that the state legislature, to get a recalcitrant minority of anti-tax legislators to pass state budgets, gave up taxes on the top brackets and the much-maligned vehicle license fee (VLF) during the height of the dot-com bubble. Each year since 1991, the state budget's ability to generate revenue has been compromised by rescinding one or more taxes. This meant the accumulated loss of many billions of dollars in revenue, contributing greatly to the current deficit.
Indeed, the VLF alone was worth $4 billion per year when Schwarzenegger, to great applause by the legislative Republicans, eliminated it. The VLF today is estimated to be worth close to $6 billion. Add up the loss of that amount each year since Schwarzenegger's election, and you have the budget deficit. Until last summer, Schwarzenegger clung to the position that he would not raise taxes. (Technically, the VLF is a fee; but since he called it "the Gray Davis car tax" throughout his recall campaign, that's what it remains in the public mind.)
Public services in general, and public education in particular, have been underfunded in California since 1978 and the enactment of Proposition 13. This law substantially shifted the burden of funding many locally delivered services to the state, without providing appropriate mechanisms to pay for them. Increased spending on education in the late 1990s and into 2001 was finally beginning to address years of neglect. Now the gains of these years have been reversed. Per pupilfunding in California now ranks 46th in the nation.
What to do about it: 1) Progressive Taxation the revenue options below would raise an estimated $16 billion per year, essentially solving the state's structural budget problem:
Bring the top income tax bracket (people who make more than $300,000) back from 9.3% to 11% ($5 billion)
2)Reinstate the vehicle license fee ($6 billion per year)
3)Re-assess non-residential real property ($3 billion per year)
4)Limit mortgage interest deductions to $50,000 in interest ($47 million per year)
5)Require that large corporations file as corporations, not “S” type partnerships ($500 to 600 million per year)
6)Enact severance tax on oil produced in California ($.5 billion per year)
7)Extend sales tax to Internet purchases ($20 million)
These are each worthy proposals. But the real problem that needs to be addressed to solve California's budget problems is Proposition 13. It builds in inequities between residential and commercial taxation, and, depending on when a homeowner buys a house, inequities among homeowners as well. Reform of Proposition 13, which locks in a broken budget system, is an urgent priority.

The "two thirds" problem: blocking democracy. The problem with these ideas is that in California, any tax increase must be approved by a supermajority of 2/3 in the state legislature. California is one of just three states that require more than a simple majority to raise taxes. Each year a small minority of legislators, opposed to tax increases on ideological grounds, can block the will of the majority and prevent a balanced approach to solving the budget crisis. That's what happens every year, including last year, once again. Legislators should be able to enact a necessary tax increase with a simple majority instead of wrangling endlessly with hard core anti-tax ideologues.
Over time we must convince our legislators and the governor that only progressive tax reform can solve the long-term crisis. The problem isn't "overspending." This is a simplistic analysis of a complex problem. California is a big and growing state, and needs big revenues to function.
We are currently witnessing the return of the Gilded Age, in which the wealthiest among us continue to increase their riches at the expense of the rest of us. The top one percent of wealth holders in the United States owns one third of the assets of the country. The top ten percent owns 70% of the wealth. That leaves the bottom ninety percent of wealth holders–the overwhelming majority–with less than a third of the country's wealth. When Barack Obama spoke of "spreading the wealth around," this is the reality to which he was referring.
Don't let people tell you that "we don't have the money" for a decent public education system. The money's there. It's just in the wrong pockets. Tell your legislators.

Other Resources on the State Budget Crisis

From CFT president Marty Hittelman

A message from CFT president Marty Hittelman, or otherwise know as - when is the CTA going to get off it's ass, stop squandering the 70 million a year it takes from us and do something to save jobs~!?
.

I am asking you to take a few minutes out of your busy life to contact your legislators. We must act now to help prevent massive reductions in funding to public education and social services.

Send a letter to your legislators

California is facing the most severe budget crisis since the passage of Prop 13 in 1978. In many ways it is even worse today, as we have already experienced many years of large cuts to public education and social services.
Read more...

L.A. teachers arrested in civil disobedience protest Print E-mail

utlacd2

May 15 — Several dozen members and leaders of United Teachers Los Angeles (UTLA) were arrested when they sat down in the street in front of the Los Angeles Unified School District headquarters and refused to leave. UTLA had scheduled a one-day strike to protest budget reductions, layoffs and soaring class sizes, but had to revise their plan when a judge issued a restraining order that would have fined teachers and threatened revoking their credentials if they struck. Instead, teachers demonstrated before school at their sites and staged a sit in.
Read more...

CFT files suit to protect schools, community colleges Print E-mail

May 8 — The California Federation of Teachers, AFT/AFL-CIO yesterday filed suit in San Francisco Superior Court to force the state to repay nearly $12 billion slashed from the K-14 public education budget over the past two years. The CFT was joined by Service Employees International Union Local 99 in the lawsuit, which seeks to enforce voter-approved Proposition 98 minimum funding guarantees.

The CFT filed the suit following an announcement by Governor Schwarzenegger threatening to cut another $3.6 billion from the education budget. The plaintiffs said that going to court to restore school funding is a better option than passing Propositions 1A and 1B in the May 19 Special Election.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Another Fat cat bites the dust

An unbroken line of succession to higher office is well established in NEA circles. The position of secretary-treasurer is the gateway office to move from the representative elected bodies to the executive ones. Incumbent secretary-treasurers move up to vice president. Incumbent vice presidents move up to president. It works the same way in most state affiliates, and the California Teachers Association has been no exception - until now.

Current CTA President David Sanchez held both the vice president and secretary-treasurer positions, as did his predecessor, Barbara Kerr. Current CTA Vice President Dean Vogel was secretary-treasurer. But Dan Vaughn, elected two years ago as secretary-treasurer when Vogel moved up, was defeated in his bid for reelection by an unlikely candidate, Gail Mendes, former president of the United Teachers of Richmond.

Mendes is a member of the union’s State Council, the body that elected her, but did not sit on the board of directors, making her jump to an executive position quite remarkable. I’m checking into what was behind the upset victory since, as usual, there is very little to distinguish the candidates on issues.

The CTA State Council also voted to support all six budget-related initiatives on the May 19 special election ballot, even though the California Nurses Association opposes all six, and the California Federation of Teachers opposes all but one.


MusicPlaylistRingtones
Create a playlist at MixPod.com

This is the fight of our professional careers. Are You In or Out?

What's taking so long? This is the fight of our professional careers. Are You In or Out? "Hell has a special level for those who sit by idly during times of great crisis."
Robert Kennedy

The Art of SETTING LIMITS, Its not as easy as it looks.

Art of Setting Limits Setting limits is one of the most powerful tools that professionals have to promote positive behavior change for their clients, students, residents, patients, etc. Knowing there are limits on their behavior helps the individuals in your charge to feel safe. It also helps them learn to make appropriate choices.


There are many ways to go about setting limits, but staff members who use these techniques must keep three things in mind:
Setting a limit is not the same as issuing an ultimatum.
Limits aren’t threats—If you don’t attend group, your weekend privileges will be suspended.

Limits offer choices with consequences—If you attend group and follow the other steps in your plan, you’ll be able to attend all of the special activities this weekend. If you don’t attend group, then you’ll have to stay behind. It’s your decision.
The purpose of limits is to teach, not to punish.
Through limits, people begin to understand that their actions, positive or negative, result in predictable consequences. By giving such choices and consequences, staff members provide a structure for good decision making.
Setting limits is more about listening than talking.
Taking the time to really listen to those in your charge will help you better understand their thoughts and feelings. By listening, you will learn more about what’s important to them, and that will help you set more meaningful limits.
Download The Art of Setting Limits

SYSTEMATIC USE OF CHILD LABOR


CHILD DOMESTIC HELP
by Amanda Kloer

Published February 21, 2010 @ 09:00AM PT
category: Child Labor
Wanted: Domestic worker. Must be willing to cook, clean, work with garbage, and do all other chores as assigned. No contract available, payment based on employer's mood or current financial situation. No days off. Violence, rape, and sexual harassment may be part of the job.

Would you take that job? No way. But for thousands of child domestic workers in Indonesia, this ad doesn't just describe their job, it describes their life.

A recent CARE International survey of over 200 child domestic workers in Indonesia found that 90% of them didn't have a contract with their employer, and thus no way to legally guarantee them a fair wage (or any wage at all) for their work. 65% of them had never had a day off in their whole employment, and 12% had experienced violence. Child domestic workers remain one of the most vulnerable populations to human trafficking and exploitation. And while work and life may look a little grim for the kids who answered CARE's survey, it's likely that the most abused and exploited domestic workers didn't even have the opportunity to take the survey.

In part, child domestic workers have it so much harder than adults because the people who hire children are more likely looking for someone easy to exploit. Think about it -- if you wanted to hire a domestic worker, wouldn't you choose an adult with a stronger body and more life experience to lift and haul and cook than a kid? If you could get them both for the same price, of course you would. But what if the kid was cheaper, free even, because you knew she wouldn't try and leave if you stopped paying her. Or even if you threatened her with death.



Congress Aims to Improve Laws for Runaway, Prostituted Kids

by Amanda Kloer

categories: Child Prostitution, Pimping

Published February 20, 2010 @ 09:00AM PT

The prospects for healthcare reform may be chillier than DC weather, but Democrats in the House and Senate are turning their attention to another warmer but still significant national issue: the increasing number of runaway and throwaway youth who are being forced into prostitution. In response to the growing concerns that desperate, runaway teens will be forced into prostitution in a sluggish economy, Congress is pushing several bills to improve how runaway kids are tracked by the police, fund crucial social services, and prevent teens from being caught in sex trafficking. Here's the gist of what the new legislation is trying to accomplish:

Shelter: Lack of shelter is one of the biggest vulnerabilities of runaway and homeless youth. Pimps will often use an offer of shelter as an entree to a relationship with a child or a straight up trade for sex. In the past couple years, at least 10 states have made legislative efforts to increase the number of shelters, extend shelter options, and change state reporting requirements so that youth shelters have enough time to win trust and provide services before they need to report the runaways to the police. Much of the new federal legislation would make similar increases in the availability and flexibility of shelter options.

Police Reporting: Right now, police are supposed to enter all missing persons into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database within two hours of receiving the case. In reality, that reporting doesn't always get done, making it almost impossible for law enforcement to search for missing kids across districts. This hole is a big problem in finding child prostitution victims and their pimps, since pimps will often transport girls from state to state. The new bill would strengthen reporting requirements, as well as facilitate communication between the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the National Runaway Switchboard

We Must Never Forget These Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen and Women

We Must Never Forget These Soldiers, Sailors and Airmen and Women
Nor the Fool Politicians that used so many American GIs' lives as fodder for the fight over an english noun - "Communism"