"... for (in a democracy) it is not enough to allow dissent, rather... we must demand it!" Robert Kennedy 1966. All material appearing in this hole are offered in the public domain and may be reproduced. However, this publication may not be reproduced for a fee without permission. This blog is not for profit. WE ARE NOT AFILIATED WITH ANY SCHOOL DISTRICT, LABOR UNION, SCHOOL BOARD, or COLLECTIVE. WE RESERVE THE RIGHT TO INSULT THEM ALL! Proudly, we are NOT Owned by Rupert Murdoch or the CTA!
Showing posts with label Heros. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Heros. Show all posts
Wednesday, December 26, 2012
Friday, August 10, 2012
Friday, June 1, 2012
Educator of the Year!
Educator of the Year 2011!
CTA's Educator of the Year is Often a Great Teacher, but always a non-political, without options, without opinions and whose real qualification for the benign appointment is their ability to talk the Burlingame rhetoric (SIMILAR IN SIGNIFICANCE TO... "DO'N THE HAND-JIVE") with robot like precision. While being undeniably good at their craft, they are in fact, the "person(S) most likely if there were a real vote, to be voted "Miss Congeniality"). Actually, I believe at one time David Sanchez was Miss Congeniality. Five years straight!
So we at Disenfranchised-Educators have taken it upon ourselves to announce our own Educator of the Year. The qualities we will always seek for this entitled position are: that person be not only a good highly qualified educator whether classified, certificated, or administrative; who works hard (not 70 hours a week) and works passionately for students, their parents and and their coworkers. "Educators count too!" And it is mandatory that they have some sense of political awareness. We unreservedly embrace that idea even if theirs is a political position contrary to ours here at Disenfranchised – Educators, we must honor and investigate descention for its true utility. And unwavering foundation in a true democracy.
This year myself, our entire editorial staff (currently rumored to be somewhere in a bar near Juarez, Mexico) and our one reader – Marion where ever he is, have unanimously elected Ms. Maura Larkins of San Diego. She herself works from a blog site for educators. Our editorial staff have, in consultation with reader Marion (who in turn Bankrolled the cause - Yesterday's lunch) take great pleasure in announcing the manypayments, many accomplishments and legal victories of this months winner; Maura. Tenacity and unwavering passion for doing the right thing sets her apart. Thank you Maura. "You have more admirers than you'll ever know."
I Praetorian
Along with the many note worthy legal poundings She has given to the Southern California School Districts' special are those givin to those ignorant enough or so poorly managed that they fell prey to the cheapest choice of legal seaguls; Friedman, Flouckman and Freud. Otherwise known as the F-UP law partners law firm.
F, F and FU have a Walmart approach toward signing and defending school districts. READ - Spending YOUR TAX DOLLARS. (even better, more than 400 School Districts nearby depend on the F-UP GROUP who prey on simple minded HR directors and administrators, teasing them in with 200 dollars a billable hour. However, with 400 districts REPRESENTED, they don't even know the names of most of their superintendents. They actually have yet to prove they have 400 employees at all. Including the custodial staffs in two states. Still worse I hear. They keep loosing attorneys ...
to the prison system and FEW OF THOSE ARE CAREER MOVES. SO, IAM TOLD.
Tune in next week for Maura's Bio and Opinions on Education in California.
PLUS! Next week
"THE WORST EDUCATOR OF THE YEAR FOR 2011." You might be surprised... A first only at Disenfranchised-Educators.
CTA's Educator of the Year is Often a Great Teacher, but always a non-political, w
So we at Disenfranchised-Educators have taken it upon ourselves to announce our own Educator of the Year. The qualities we will always seek for this entitled position are: that person be not only a good highly qualified educator whether classified, certificated, or administrative; who works hard (not 70 hours a week) and works passionately for students, their parents and and their coworkers. "Educators count too!" And it is mandatory that they have some sense of political awareness. We unreservedly embrace that idea even if theirs is a political position contrary to ours here at Disenfranchised – Educators, we must honor and investigate descention for its true utility. And unwavering foundation in a true democracy.
This year myself, our entire editorial staff (currently rumored to be somewhere in a bar near Juarez, Mexico) and our one reader – Marion where ever he is, have unanimously elected Ms. Maura Larkins of San Diego. She herself works from a blog site for educators. Our editorial staff have, in consultation with reader Marion (who in turn Bankrolled the cause - Yesterday's lunch) take great pleasure in announcing the many
I Praetorian
Along with the many note worthy legal poundings She has given to the Southern California School Districts' special are those givin to those ignorant enough or so poorly managed that they fell prey to the cheapest choice of legal seaguls; Friedman, Flouckman and Freud. Otherwise known as the F-UP law partners law firm.
F, F and FU have a Walmart approach toward signing and defending school districts. READ - Spending YOUR TAX DOLLARS. (even better, more than 400 School Districts nearby depend on the F-UP GROUP who prey on simple minded HR directors and administrators, teasing them in with 200 dollars a billable hour. However, with 400 districts REPRESENTED, they don't even know the names of most of their superintendents. They actually have yet to prove they have 400 employees at all. Including the custodial staffs in two states. Still worse I hear. They keep loosing attorneys ...
to the prison system and FEW OF THOSE ARE CAREER MOVES. SO, IAM TOLD.
Tune in next week for Maura's Bio and Opinions on Education in California.
PLUS! Next week
"THE WORST EDUCATOR OF THE YEAR FOR 2011." You might be surprised... A first only at Disenfranchised-Educators.
Monday, March 26, 2012
Testing and the State Trustees
State of California
Edmund G. Brown Jr., Governor
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION
1430 N Street, Suite 5111Sacramento, CA 95814
Phone: 916-319-0827
Fax: 916-319-0175
March 15, 2012
Norma Martinez
State Trustee
Greenfield Union School District
493 El Camino Real
Greenfield, CA 93927
State Trustee
Greenfield Union School District
493 El Camino Real
Greenfield, CA 93927
Dear Ms. Martinez:
On behalf of the State Board of Education (SBE), we wish to thank you for your service as State Trustee of the Greenfield Union School District (SD). You have done an exemplary job and your commitment to the students, parents, and community of Greenfield is greatly appreciated.
As you know, at the September and November 2011 SBE meetings, the members of the SBE approved your recommendation to move towards the Exit Plan and return full local governing authority to the local governing board on or before June 30, 2012.
As you proposed, and we agreed in our follow-up discussions, your last day of service will be May 25, 2012. This will allow time for continuing work on some critical components of the exit plan, including the development and approval by the governing board of the academic plan for closing the achievement gap, development of a superintendent evaluation process, and continued governance training.
Consistent with our mutual agreement, please consider this letter notice pursuant to Section 10 of the MOU, effective March 26, 2012, of termination of the MOU between you, as Trustee of the Greenfield Union SD, and the State Board of Education. With the termination of this MOU, full authority for the governance of the Greenfield Union SD will return to the local governing board beginning on May 26, 2012.
Upon termination of this MOU, the Greenfield Union SD will be responsible for calculating your final paycheck based on your monthly compensation and expense allotment, as specified in the MOU, through May 25, 2012. As is required by Labor Code section 227.3, your final paycheck will also include payment for any annual leave days earned through May 25, 2012 that you have accrued but not yet used.
Again, on behalf of the State Board of Education, we thank you for all that you have accomplished in your two years of service.
Sincerely,
Michael W. Kirst (signed)
President
President
Susan K. Burr (signed)
Executive Director
Executive Director
cc: Patricia L. de Cos, Deputy Executive Director
Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Members, State Board of Education
Nancy Kotowski, Monterey County Superintendent of Schools
Maria Castillo, President, Greenfield Union SD
Trevor McDonald, Superintendent, Greenfield Union SD
Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction
Members, State Board of Education
Nancy Kotowski, Monterey County Superintendent of Schools
Maria Castillo, President, Greenfield Union SD
Trevor McDonald, Superintendent, Greenfield Union SD
California State Board of Education
1430 N Street, Suite #5111
Sacramento, CA 95814
1430 N Street, Suite #5111
Sacramento, CA 95814
Saturday, March 17, 2012
Tuesday, March 13, 2012
Diana DeGette You Go ! In the Name of Shirley Chisolm!
Mitt Romney declared, "Planned Parenthood has got to go!" Afraid if it had been around when he was conceived he wouldn't be here today ...
Republicans have a clear agenda for women: Defund Planned Parenthood, deny women access to health care and birth control, and even prohibit women the right to participate in the debate about women’s health care.
Grassroots Democrats around the country have united against the Republican War on Women to launch a Women's Health Accountability Fund. Our goal is to expose the truth about Republicans' war on women with an aggressive rapid response operation including ads, on-the-ground organizing and more.
Grassroots Democrats around the country have united against the Republican War on Women to launch a Women's Health Accountability Fund. Our goal is to expose the truth about Republicans' war on women with an aggressive rapid response operation including ads, on-the-ground organizing and more.
Monday, March 5, 2012
What is a board of
education? Or at least what is it supposed to be?
School board members
make up the largest body of elected officials in the United States. We entrust
them to set the policies of our most treasured institutions: our public
elementary, middle and high schools. Every district has a board of education,
and boards generally meet once or twice every month in meetings that are open to the public. Sort of.
These gatherings range
from tame rubber-stamping sessions to intense, provocative discussions with the
community where controversial issues are debated and landmark decisions are
made.
School boards are
nonpartisan at least on paper. In most districts, members serve four-year terms, and terms are
staggered so seats don't become open all at once. In general, to run for school
board, you have to be at least 18 years old, a citizen of the state, a resident
of the district, a registered voter and eligible under the state constitution
to be elected to public office. In makes ethical practical sense if members have had previous experience in the education field.
In most cases, a
school district employee can't be a board member in that district. This means
no teacher, principal, librarian, custodian or anyone else that works in a
school in the district can serve on the school board, unless they resign from
the employed position.
School districts are
complex corporations; they' re often the largest employers in a community and
the decisions they make reach far, affecting jobs, resources and most
importantly, the education of all children.
What do they do?
Somewhere in between
the agendas, public comment sessions and resolutions, school boards make a
number of important decisions. School boards establish a vision for the
community's schools. They have to set up and maintain an effective, efficient
organizational structure for the district that lets the superintendent and
administrators manage the schools, teachers teach and students learn.
They are responsible
for hiring and evaluating a superintendent, evaluating and adopting policies
that affect all schools in the district, serving as a judicial and appeals body
when conflicts go unresolved, monitoring and adjusting district finances, and
managing the collective bargaining process in the district.
A school board has a
symbolic role as well. The behavior it shows off in the meeting room, the
rapport among school board members and the relationships that members have with
teachers and administrators in the district all add up to the climate of public
education in a community. Whether healthy or dysfunctional, a school board has
a heavy influence on the spirit that characterizes a community's impression of
its school system.
How can I tell if my
school board is doing a good job?
By attending a few
school board meetings, you'll learn firsthand what school boards do. Call your
district office to find out where and when meetings are held. Once you've
observed your school board in action, you'll be prepared to ask the following
questions:
· How
does the school board make decisions? Do the members function as predictable, single-issue
advocates, or do they approach each decision with an open mind? Do they seem to
make strategic choices for the well-being of the district? Strong
decision-making requires analysis, the balancing of needs and concerns, and the
ability to see the long-term implications of an action.
· How's
the team spirit? Does the board exhibit a
healthy group dynamic, or is it a parade of egos marching single-file? Do
members show respect and trust for each other, and for the operating rules of
the board?
· Is
the board's authority well defined? The classic challenges of management don't skip over your
board of education. There's a delicate balance between the board's act of
choosing a strong chief executive (the superintendent) and letting him or her
lead the way and the board's tendency to get involved with many levels of
decision-making.
·
Does the board understand the community? One of the most difficult parts of school governance is creating a strong relationship with the public. An effective board knows and respects its community, and encourages the community's trust in its school system.
Does the board understand the community? One of the most difficult parts of school governance is creating a strong relationship with the public. An effective board knows and respects its community, and encourages the community's trust in its school system.
What should I look for
in a school board candidate?
First of all, you
should think about the issues that are important to you in your school
district. Are you concerned about student transportation, textbook adoption,
funding for extracurricular activities, new curriculum standards and/or
construction of new school facilities? What's your hot button? You'll want to
find out where the candidates stand on issues that are important to you.
You might also look
for the following qualities:
· The ability to work well with a
team and support group decisions, along with an understanding that the board
sets a climate for the entire district
A desire to work toward a stronger relationship between the district and the public it serves
·
A keen eye toward serving the needs of all students, regardless of their abilities and backgrounds
A keen eye toward serving the needs of all students, regardless of their abilities and backgrounds
·
A professional, poised demeanor and respectful, respectable behavior Respect for diverse points of view
A professional, poised demeanor and respectful, respectable behavior Respect for diverse points of view
Commitment to the time and energy required each week for meetings, phone calls, conversations, visits to schools, and professional development seminars and workshops
Knowledge about district policies, guidelines, needs, challenges and strengths. Experience working as an educator should be essential.
At the heart of it all, members of a district's board of education must believe, unequivocally, in the value of public education. They must be dedicated to serving and teaching all children. They must believe in the democratic process and understand that their role is to act strategically, in line with the interests of the entire school community
Saturday, November 5, 2011
I know not everyone is a heavyweight boxing fan...
Brought to you by Praetorian Invictus Publications and Trash Pick Up. Coming to you from high a top mount Olympus. STEAL THIS BLOG PLEASE!
I, Praetorian
I, Praetorian
Joe Frazier's legacy will include more than his battles with Muhammad Ali
Sunday, November 06, 2011, 12:08 AM
By Jerry Izenberg edited by I, Praetorian
Former heavyweight boxing champion Joe Frazier, shown in 2009, has been diagnosed with liver cancer.
Joe Frazier is dying inside a hospice in Philadelphia. He has liver cancer. Soon the Philadelphia left hook that seemed to have a life all its own will have lost every ounce of its thunder. Soon, Joe will be gone.
But Death, be not proud because you will not beat Joe. He will simply have run out of time before the final bell rings. In his last moments, his mind will still have him moving forward with that little bounce in his stride. And it will be as if he's saying:
"Come on, Death. Show me what you got. You might win, but before you do I got something here for you."
So what follows here is the way I will always remember him. I covered his career. I was there on the night in the Philippines when he and Muhammad Ali left giant footprints as their legacy.
Perhaps the best way to understand that is to begin in the wake of their first dramatic meeting in New York. This was one week after Joe Frazier had dumped the once and future heavyweight champion Muhammad Ali on his rear end on that long-gone night in Madison Square Garden.
Now we were standing outside a deli not far from the Joe Frazier Gym in North Philadelphia and these three kids, maybe 9 years old each, were running toward us shouting:
"Joe Frazier ... Joe Frazier ... Joe Frazier."
And the smile on Joe's face as they came nearer and nearer seemed to light up the tired, gray neighborhood. As they danced around him, Joe sent an aide back to his Rolls-Royce for autographed pictures. He gave one to each and Joe told them: "Now y'all stay in school. Don't make me have to find you."
Two of them laughed, but the third one said:
"My daddy says Muhammad Ali was drugged,"
In that instant a cold, cold mask seemed to slide across the champion's face. "Yeah ... yeah," Joe said, "I drugged him with a left hook." And they saw the look in his eyes and all three of them ran away.
Frazier turned to me and said:
"You heard that. What I got to do? What the hell I got to do?"
There was nothing he could do. Not then. Not ever. The sheer force of Ali's personality would doom him to a role as destiny's stepchild. The impossible riddle Joe posed that afternoon would follow him through his always courageous and often brilliant career. It was a question with no answer.
This is what Herman Melville meant when he wrote of Ahab's pursuit of the great white whale in Moby Dick. He and Ali would be linked forever inside a crucible of their own making. You could not mention one without the other.
Each time they would push each other to a place where neither had been before. Styles make fights and the very nature of their styles dictated that each time they met, they were not fighting for a belt or a crown. They did not fight for the championship of the world or Paraguay or Manila.
No matter that Ali had the personality, the charm, the wit to dominate America's memory. Joe had the tools to force greatness upon Muhammad. That's why the thing they fought to claim was the heavyweight championship. The true fight was for claim over the other.
And they both knew it.
It was never more obvious than on a sweltering day inside the Araneta Coliseum in Quezon City just beyond the Manila skyline. It was at least 100 degrees inside that arena. At the start, Ali was, well, Ali — dancing, jabbing, taunting, winning. But something out of the ordinary happened in the fourth.
For virtually all of his career, Joe Frazier was a one-handed fighter (but what a hand!). His left hook was ferocious. His right hand? Well, you had to wonder whether he could even tie his shoes with it.
But in the gym in Philly, Eddie Futch, the head trainer, and Georgie Benton, his assistant, worked for weeks on that right hand. "You are going to give him something to think about," Futch said over and over.
And in that fourth, Joe threw a right hand that landed on Ali's head.
“You ain't got no right hand," Muhammad chanted shaking off the amazement. And then — POP. Another one.
"They told me you old," Ali said, breathing hard.
"They told you wrong," Joe shot back.
And now suddenly it was a fight. A fight? Hell, it was the greatest heavyweight fight since Cain and Abel.
The ebb and flow was incredible. Guys get up off the mat in a fight and, once in a while, win. But you rarely see one guy losing and then winning and then losing and then ...
Well, you get the idea.
In the end this fight was decided by anatomy. The shorter Frazier began to experience huge swelling around the eyes. In order to see, he had to straighten up — the exact opposite of his corner's game plan.
Ali now was winning. But in Round 13, he was so exhausted at a time when Frazier stood there with both arms down and legs exhibiting all the power of wet spaghetti. All Ali had to do was walk 5 feet or so and touch him and it would have been over. But Ali was too weak to do it.
In the corner after 14, Futch told Benton to cut Joe's gloves off. Joe pushed and shoved and threatened, but they came off. Then Ali saw that it was over and collapsed.
Nobody was tougher than Joe Frazier. Nobody had a bigger heart.
Death will probably win this last fight, but knowing Joe in that hazy limbo that spells the end, he'll probably tell old Death, "Don't gloat. Fifteen years ago, you wouldn't have laid a glove on me."
And forever after, I'll believe Joe was right.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
This is the fight of our professional careers. Are You In or Out?
What's taking so long? This is the fight of our professional careers. Are You In or Out? "Hell has a special level for those who sit by idly during times of great crisis."
Robert Kennedy
The Art of SETTING LIMITS, Its not as easy as it looks.
Art of Setting Limits Setting limits is one of the most powerful tools that professionals have to promote positive behavior change for their clients, students, residents, patients, etc. Knowing there are limits on their behavior helps the individuals in your charge to feel safe. It also helps them learn to make appropriate choices.
There are many ways to go about setting limits, but staff members who use these techniques must keep three things in mind:
Setting a limit is not the same as issuing an ultimatum.
Limits aren’t threats—If you don’t attend group, your weekend privileges will be suspended.
Limits offer choices with consequences—If you attend group and follow the other steps in your plan, you’ll be able to attend all of the special activities this weekend. If you don’t attend group, then you’ll have to stay behind. It’s your decision.
The purpose of limits is to teach, not to punish.
Through limits, people begin to understand that their actions, positive or negative, result in predictable consequences. By giving such choices and consequences, staff members provide a structure for good decision making.
Setting limits is more about listening than talking.
Taking the time to really listen to those in your charge will help you better understand their thoughts and feelings. By listening, you will learn more about what’s important to them, and that will help you set more meaningful limits.
Download The Art of Setting Limits
SYSTEMATIC USE OF CHILD LABOR
CHILD DOMESTIC HELP
by Amanda Kloer
Published February 21, 2010 @ 09:00AM PT
category: Child Labor
Wanted: Domestic worker. Must be willing to cook, clean, work with garbage, and do all other chores as assigned. No contract available, payment based on employer's mood or current financial situation. No days off. Violence, rape, and sexual harassment may be part of the job.
Would you take that job? No way. But for thousands of child domestic workers in Indonesia, this ad doesn't just describe their job, it describes their life.
A recent CARE International survey of over 200 child domestic workers in Indonesia found that 90% of them didn't have a contract with their employer, and thus no way to legally guarantee them a fair wage (or any wage at all) for their work. 65% of them had never had a day off in their whole employment, and 12% had experienced violence. Child domestic workers remain one of the most vulnerable populations to human trafficking and exploitation. And while work and life may look a little grim for the kids who answered CARE's survey, it's likely that the most abused and exploited domestic workers didn't even have the opportunity to take the survey.
In part, child domestic workers have it so much harder than adults because the people who hire children are more likely looking for someone easy to exploit. Think about it -- if you wanted to hire a domestic worker, wouldn't you choose an adult with a stronger body and more life experience to lift and haul and cook than a kid? If you could get them both for the same price, of course you would. But what if the kid was cheaper, free even, because you knew she wouldn't try and leave if you stopped paying her. Or even if you threatened her with death.
Congress Aims to Improve Laws for Runaway, Prostituted Kids
by Amanda Kloercategories: Child Prostitution, Pimping
Published February 20, 2010 @ 09:00AM PT
The prospects for healthcare reform may be chillier than DC weather, but Democrats in the House and Senate are turning their attention to another warmer but still significant national issue: the increasing number of runaway and throwaway youth who are being forced into prostitution. In response to the growing concerns that desperate, runaway teens will be forced into prostitution in a sluggish economy, Congress is pushing several bills to improve how runaway kids are tracked by the police, fund crucial social services, and prevent teens from being caught in sex trafficking. Here's the gist of what the new legislation is trying to accomplish:
Shelter: Lack of shelter is one of the biggest vulnerabilities of runaway and homeless youth. Pimps will often use an offer of shelter as an entree to a relationship with a child or a straight up trade for sex. In the past couple years, at least 10 states have made legislative efforts to increase the number of shelters, extend shelter options, and change state reporting requirements so that youth shelters have enough time to win trust and provide services before they need to report the runaways to the police. Much of the new federal legislation would make similar increases in the availability and flexibility of shelter options.
Police Reporting: Right now, police are supposed to enter all missing persons into the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database within two hours of receiving the case. In reality, that reporting doesn't always get done, making it almost impossible for law enforcement to search for missing kids across districts. This hole is a big problem in finding child prostitution victims and their pimps, since pimps will often transport girls from state to state. The new bill would strengthen reporting requirements, as well as facilitate communication between the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children and the National Runaway Switchboard